So basically, the “doggy style” photos generated “influential excitement” among the contest’s voters-an important competitive advantage for all future entrants to consider. Other features, like piercings in the clitoral hood, didn’t affect the ratings,” read the study. “Indeed, pictures depicting contest entrants in a doggy style position obtained ratings 2 points higher on average (p <0.001) than others. Moreover, the “doggy style” posture featured in these entries made it difficult for the scientists to complete the necessary measurements. Not only was she a part of a nude photoshoot by posing for Playboy in 2004 herself, but she is also someone who defends athletes for taking part in nude photoshoots.
The winners’ photos, however, were not included in the study-having been among the participants whose photos were not able to be considered. The beautiful athlete was approached to grace the cover photo and complete the sexy pictorial of the Playboy. But the combined percentages of voters who preferred more complex classes of vulvas far outweighed those who preferred the simplest style.” “As expected from the rankings that we saw at the country and local levels, Class 1 vulvas are preferred over the others more often. To prevent vaginal bias, the same person also conducted all of these measurements. The scientists later used this research to classify the contest’s entries into six different categories of “vulval morphology.”Ī chart detailing the six classes is included below: They measured labia majora length, labia minora length, and clitoral hood length.įinally, the scientists rated the complexity of the labia minora they used the three categories of rugosity (smooth, moderate, marked) to do so. The scientists viewed each entry on a 15-inch computer screen, zooming in “until the genitalia were easily measured using a screen ruler,” read the paper. The Vulva Paper’s website says scientists “used the contest data to assess the diversity in vulval morphology and voters’ preference for different morphologies.” A total of 182 women participated in the contest 110 entries were examined for the study (if measurements could not be taken from the photo, the entry was not considered). If you’re a visual learner, you can view photo examples of each class here. The data was then compiled in “ The Vulva Paper.”
Sloan contracted a group of data scientists to analyze the contest’s findings for their scientific implications. Meet the winners of the ‘World’s Most Beautiful Vagina’ pageant The ‘World’s Most Beautiful Vagina’ winners, as explained by scientists These winners will also be flown out to Los Angeles, where their vulvas will be 3D-scanned to later be reproduced for the Autoblow device.
0 kommentar(er)
